Full screen - press [F11]
David Ben Gurion : ---- " If you believe in ISRAEL, you can't call yourself - ATHEIST "!... "In Israel, in order to be a realist you must believe in miracles" ... Ada,this one is for you!... "The knowledge of how to FEAR what ought to be feared and how not to FEAR what ought not to be feared is called - COURAGE"... "Anyone who believes you can't change HISTORY has never tried to write his MEMORIES"... "I don't know what the people WANT ! All I know is what they NEED"... " Well done, now give it back to them." ( Spoken to Louis Nir in June 1967, after his unit captured Hebron in the Six-Day War )... "UM - SHMUM" ( The UN - Bla Bla Bla ! ) ... "If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert"...
web counter web counter

ALWAYS ON TOP ( Scroll down for recent postings )

This Blog is now officially closed!
29 - 03 - 2012 23:00 GMT
Please visit :-
. .

Monday, January 30, 2012

Google placed a notice

Search for the term “Jew” on Google 
& see what pops-up on top!...

Sunday, January 29, 2012

What happened after the Mongols?

They say that those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it, so pay attention for Christ's sake. It turns out that many of our ancestors achieved levels of violence that take them right out of the realm of "badass" and into the less cool area of ball-shriveling atrocity.
These are the civilizations you don't want to face during, say, your next time travel adventure. And yes, the Spartans are down there.

#5.  The Celts

History is kind of spotty on the Celts (they never wrote anything down, and many of the witnesses died brutally) but what facts survived confirm one thing: They had gigantic Celtic balls.
First of all, they had a thing for severed heads. After a long and trying battle they'd all unwind at the end of the day by collecting a few souvenir heads. Then they'd bring them home and decorate the house with them. So the average Celt home probably looked like a hunter's trophy room, crossed with the scene at the end of Halloween when all the mutilated bodies start popping up around every corner. Sweet dreams kids!

If they felt that yours was a head of particular importance, they'd embalm it and whip it out at parties to brag about how awesome they were. When they were alone they'd probably wiggle your jaw around and pretend you were complimenting them.
The reason for all of these head-chopping-good-times was that the Celts believed that the head held the soul, and so if you cut a dead guy's head off before all of that juicy soul leaked out of it, it was yours. A finders-keepers sort of deal, you might say.

A modern Celt.

So, Were They Really So Bad?
Hey, remember Braveheart? And how batshit insane Wallace's army looked with their faces painted blue?

Well, the Celts would sometimes paint themselves blue and fight completely naked. Just because. One would assume that fighting in the nude would present some rather sensitive targets to one's enemies (we're talking about their nuts), but it seems that the Celts were so frigging manly that they just didn't care. It was the ultimate insult: "I am not afraid of you, and to prove it, I have just laid my dong on your sword."

#4.  The Aztecs

You remember Temple of Doom, and how that unfortunate gentleman had his heart ripped out right before they dropped him down the lava hole? Well, picture lots of that, only this time mom isn't around to turn off the VCR and stop your crying. That's the Aztecs.
The Aztecs believed that for every 52 years that passed, the world would end unless the gods were strong enough. And, as is common knowledge, the best way to toughen up a god is with a steady stream of constant human sacrifice (along with a dash of cannibalism, just for good measure).

Most of the sacrificing went towards keeping their Sun god happy, and it took place on top of giant pyramid, so at least the view was probably pretty good. Then they'd hold you down, saw through your ribs and take out your heart (which was likely still beating). Then, as if things couldn't get any worse, they'd throw you down the staircase.
So, Were They Really So Bad?

Yes. Yes they were. Did we mention the cannibalism? After they removed your heart and threw you down the stairs, they'd eat your arms and thighs, and whatever other bits looked tasty (the nuts? We do not know).

Some historians think that nourishment was the main reason behind all of this willy-nilly human sacrifice, as the Aztecs had no domesticated animals to slaughter, and as such their diet was low in fat and animal-stuff. You know how it is if you've ever had a roommate try a vegetarian diet. It's just a matter of time until you start waking up with teeth marks on your extremities.
And that's not even the bad part. The Aztecs held themselves to a high standard and for every situation they asked, "Could we make this more gut-wrenchingly gruesome?" So, for instance, during the sacrifice to the fire god, a newly-wed couple would be tossed into, you guessed it, a fire. Then, right before they finally died (from their horrendous burns), they'd drag them out, flesh still smoking, and dig out their hearts.

Wait, it gets better! There was the offering to the earth goddess, which involved a young woman's skin being removed and worn around like a Silence of the Lambs-style serial killer flesh suit.
On one hand you might ask why none of the Aztecs thought this was odd. On the other hand, if somebody had an objection to the ceremonies we're guessing they kept that shit to themselves.
#3.  The Assyrians

The thing about the Assyrians is that they were basically the ancient Mesopotamian equivalent to that loveable team of underdogs in every sports movie. They had a lot of spunk and a can-do attitude, but, try as they might, they just couldn't seem to make it into the big leagues.
Luckily for them (and unluckily for everyone else), just as that loveable sports team will sooner or later stumble upon secret weapon, a magic dog with an unusual aptitude for kicking field goals perhaps, after a couple of hundred years of being constantly harassed by more powerful nations, the Assyrians came across their own secret weapon. No, it wasn't Emilio Estevez, but it was nearly as powerful.

It was iron. The Assyrians were the first people to start using iron weapons instead of bronze which, to put into a modern perspective, is sort of like showing up for a knife fight with the Death Star. Using iron made the Assyrians so near-invincible that, really, the other guys might as well have been swinging around bananas.

So, Were They Really So Bad?

Well, in a word, yes. Here's a cheery little quote from King Ashurnasirpal, who spent much of his spare time baking cherry pies for the homeless and teaching the neighborhood kids how to correctly adjust their bike helmets:
"I built a pillar over against his city gate, and I flayed all the chief men who had revolted, and I covered the pillar with their skins; some I walled up within the pillar, some I impaled upon the pillar on stakes, and others I bound to stakes round the about the pillar; many within the border of my own land I flayed, and I spread their skins upon the walls; and I cut off the limbs of the officers, of the royal officers who had rebelled."

"And then I was thinking about slap boxing with a lion, but only if there's time."

Ever have one of those days when you just wanted to get out of the house and flay somebody? Yep, you're probably a sociopath.
Sure, we understand that intimidation was how invading armies ended wars before they started, that this kind of psychological warfare was crucial for a conquering army. But reading that up there, we're pretty sure the Assyrians just enjoyed it.
#2.  The Spartans

All it took was one movie, and now everybody knows the ancient Spartans weren't the kind of guys you'd want to invite to your fancy cheese-tasting party. They'd probably stumble in, mock you for not being a full-time member of the military, then impale all of your guests with spears. Not to mention they'd eat all your fancy cheeses.
And you know what? It wasn't just a movie. That thing at the beginning of 300 where they'd toss all imperfect babies off the cliff, letting them splatter on the rocks below? They really did that. But first they would bathe the newborn in wine, to see if it was strong enough to survive. That's right; being a Spartan meant you had to handle your damned liquor right out of the damned womb.

So, Were They Really So Bad?
Every single Spartan male was a soldier. Every other job was done by slaves; the Spartan men were warriors and that was that. They fought until they could finally retire at the age of 60 (about the equivalent of living to 400 years old today).
Of course if you lived to be that ripe old age, were a good father and scholar and all-around great guy, too bad. You didn't even get a headstone when you died, you didn't deserve it. The only Spartans who got marked headstones were the ones who died in battle, during victory. Think you're a war hero? Well, if you're still alive that meant you still weren't hero enough for Sparta.

Look at how alive they all are. Pathetic.

Oh, and if you lost your shield during battle, you got the death penalty. A true soldier would have gone back to get it, or died trying.
If we (or the movie) make them sound like heroes, well you have to know about those slaves we mentioned earlier. The Spartans beat their slaves... by law. We don't mean the law allowed them to beat the slaves, we mean the law required it.
Things could get a lot worse for slaves, though. As a sort of coming of age holiday, there was an occasion every year upon which the young Spartan men were encouraged to sneak around and murder as many slaves as they could, without having to feel bad about it. If you didn't murder anybody, they probably called you gay.

#1.  The Mongols

Here's the thing with the Mongols. See this stadium? That's 100,000 people there.
Now imagine 400 of those stadiums, each full of people. Now imagine every single one of those people with grotesque stab wounds.
That's right; it is estimated that the Mongols--under Genghis Khan and others-- killed 40 million people.
With swords.
The Mongols ripped through the world like a lawnmower. They were like an army of Batman villains. Only Asian, and on horseback.

Even the horses look pissed.
When the Mongols got in a conquesty mood, if your town happened to be in the way, you were, as they say, "shit out of luck." The Mongols would give you two choices, both of which thoroughly sucked. The first, and most practical, was to surrender and let them take whatever they wanted (which was pretty much everything, likely including your livelihood and all the women-folk). The second choice was to not surrender, and thus promptly watch your town burn to the ground. And your fields salted. Then, just to add another scoop of crap to an already crappy day, you'd be brutally murdered.
So, Were They Really So Bad?
During an invasion of India, a Mongolian general built a pyramid in front of the walls of Delhi out of human heads. Are you picturing it? If so, are you picturing like two dozen heads there? Because this guy used 90,000 of them.
They, like the Celts, had a thing for severed heads. They liked to gather them up and catapult them inside the enemy's compound. They would also fling corpses infected with black death.

"You know, most invading hordes just use arrows."
When they ran across pregnant women, they did... things. Things we won't discuss here.
When you saw them coming, hey, you could shoot at them with your arrows and spears all you wanted. All you'd be doing is slaughtering the huge crowd of refugees the Mongols forced to march ahead of them as human shields.
So, yeah. You want to know why the Spartans have to settle for number two, that's fucking why.

And what happened after the Mongols?

History of Jihad against the Mongols (1050-1258)

Just say NO!



Saturday, January 28, 2012

Apology + SPIT!


Following the public outcry that followed blurring of the face of the late Ruth Fogel from the "Machon Meir" ad, the Institute today publish a formal apology. Statement from the head of the Institute Rabbi Dov Begun:- "sorry for the grief and pain caused by the improper publication"



Posted - 20/01/2012



Exclusion of women crosses new borders:

Bulletin published in hundreds of synagogues across the country published a photograph of the Fogel's family in memory of the "Itamar Massacre" 11 months ago - With Ruth's, (mother of the family), blurred image. Bulletin, published by "Machon Meir", where Ruth's father, educator, does not usually publish pictures of women for reasons of modesty!...

Friday, January 27, 2012


 - offspring and siblings in "Vishnitz"

The groom is a grandchild, Rabbi Aaron Auerbach Shlita son of Rabbi Mordechai Auerbach Shlita and groom Raved Antwerp Sternbuch Rabbi Eliyahu Shlita.
Bride to Vizhnitz, great-granddaughter Harh"k a 'Say Life Moiz'nitz zt, and granddaughter Hgh"k Rabbi Abraham David Horowitz of blessed memory Av Beit Din of Strasbourg, a son-Harh"tz Kiryat Eliezer Arnstr Av light live in Safed, which is a Harh"tz shlita Rabbi Moshe Arnstr multi Av Kiryat Haim Maor Jerusalem.
Cannibalism took place on Easter Island after the construction of the Moai contributed to environmental degradation when extreme deforestation destabilized an already precarious ecosystem.

Operation Free Palestine

Anonymous: Operation Free Palestine 

Dear Citizens of the world,

We live in the most troubled times! Ravaged by debt, enslaved by greed, and trapped by media lies! Our lives have become such a burden, that we forgo the very basic instincts of our being - to care for our fellow brothers and sisters, We must dare to speak out in support of the Palestinian people who resist and endorse the horrific existence brought upon them through our blood thirsty imperial crusade.

The people of Palestine wake up in fear everyday knowing it may be their last; they walk the streets with military tanks aiming at them, they have to go through military checkpoints every day just to get to school or work, they are denied their basic human rights, they are shot at from point blank range for peacefully protesting, innocent Palestinian children are used as human shields by the Zionist IDF soldiers.

We at Anonymous and TeaMp0isoN would like you to take a few minutes out from your busy lives and just imagine the following existence for you, your family or those you hold dear:

Imagine you wake up with no hope every day, imagine your very existence, the future of your children, even the future of your nation was decided by the bullets of an occupying force! Imagine your children growing up accepting death as an inevitable consequence of being who they are! Imagine accepting the indignity of being searched, denied the freedom of movement in your own country; imagine having to queue up at a check point with a terminally or fatally wounded child only to be told that a non medic has decided that you cannot pass, imagine having to take your child back home to watch them die knowing that there is nothing you can do! Imagine watching an illegal settler forcing you and your family from your home, imagine the authorities aiding them, imagine your children watching their children playing in the back yard - with their toys, imagine you having to live outside in a tent watching them redevelop your home! Imagine what you would say to your child when he/she asks why!

Imagine seeing F16's terrorise your children, imagine being unable to sleep, traumatised, scared, crying - imagine this happening every day! Imagine bombs tearing the limbs of your children, imagine seeing 1, 2, 3, 4 or more of your children laid out on the floor looking at you, fear stuck on their face, lifeless, not breathing, some seeming at peace, others ravaged by shrapnel, eyes missing, hands burnt, intestines slowly sliding out of an open wound, head missing, bits of their skull missing, imagine seeing your child in hospital screaming, crying, suffering, looking at you with pleading eyes, begging eyes to help take the pain away, imagine knowing there is nothing you can do because illegal weaponry like white phosphorus was cooking their insides.

just imagine what you would do!

Would you worry about your bills? Would you worry about your car, your TV, your trainers, your holiday? Would you buy the products that financed this suffering, Would you support the men and women who did this, Would you call them a defence force and the victims the terrorists? WOULD YOU?

that is EXACTLY what you are doing when you drink Coca Cola, eat a Big Mac or buy pampers for your baby and do you know about the other everyday Israeli products you purchase from which the profits gained are used to fund the suffering of the palestinian people. Do you realize the taxes that you pay feed the forces that traumatize the people of Palestine, Of course not you're more worried about not having free health care.

The people of Palestine have been robbed of their land and their freedom, the Racist Zionist state is killing innocent Palestinians using illegal chemical weapons, the governments of the world have ignored the war crimes committed by Israel, will you ignore these illegal methods and war crimes too?

Israel has been committing genocide, infanticide, and every day homicide since 1948 and the world and her citizens have been aiding and abetting and financing this! We are all complicit in the murder of the innocent! It's time to make a stand!

Anonymous, TeaMp0isoN and many other hacktivists from around the world have united, we may not be able to stop the Zionist regime, but the least we can do is raise awareness and educate people by defacing zionist websites, Operation Free Palestine is about educating the blind and terrorising the terrorist, the tables have turned, the time has come.

Existence is resistance,   (Couldn't agree more!)
We are Legion.   (We saw many "Legions" come & go!)
We do not forgive.   (Nether do WE!)
We do not forget,   (We are known for our long MEMORY!)
Expect us.    ( BET YOUR ASS ON THAT!)

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Another MUZOID!

'Christians can be treated like the Jews of Mecca'

Only in ISRAEL!...

Infant who bit head off of reptile winds up unscathed; 'I screamed until neighbors came,' horrified mom says
An encounter between a snake and a baby ended in a surprising outcome Thursday, when the infant's mother walked into his room to find him chewing on the dead reptile.
The infant, Imad Gadir, whose family resides in Shfaram, was not hurt when he bit the unlucky coin snake, but was taken to Haifa's Ramabam Medical Center, just in case.

According to Imad's grandfather, Shaheen Shaheen, who recalled the family's tumultuous morning, the boy woke up when his father left for work at 6:30 am. The 1-year-old left his parents' bed and headed to his room, where he found the 35-centimeter (13-inch) snake. He then grabbed it and bit its head off.

Imad, his father and the bitten snake

"It wasn't a pretty sight," Shaheen said. "He's a baby, he didn't know what he was doing. He thought it was a game. I don't wish this kind of thing on anyone." 

When Imad's mother realized what had happened she began screaming, until a neighbor jumped the house's fence, entered the room and snatched the snake out of the boy's hand. 

"I went to the kitchen to get him some milk, and when I came back I saw he was already eating," the mother, Alain, said. "I screamed until the neighbors came. I still can't believe what I saw." Veteran snake-catcher Eli Cohen said he has never come across a case of this kind.

"I guess the kid acted out of a childish instinct when he put the snake in his mouth," he said. "Luckily for him, the coin snake isn't poisonous, otherwise it could have ended in a tragedy." 

Eli Cohen, the owner of a pest control company, estimated that the snake was three years old, and said that his bite often hurts but is not dangerous to anyone who isn't allergic to it. He said that this type of reptile chokes his prey. "If it was a bigger snake, the boy could have been strangled."

"The Un digestible diet..."

Samak Laban Tamerind à la Tahrir

Cairo, January 2012- I did not quite know what to expect, I left the dreams, the plans, the assumptions behind me and I just headed to the most famous square in the Middle East, where the blossom of freedom had inspired the entire world. I went to see Tahrir.

At first glance, I noticed very little graffiti (apparently all the ant-SCAF graffiti has been painted on). One lady was selling post cards, a mix of famous leaders from the brotherhood’s Hassan al-Banna to Nasr, and from Che Guevara to Saddam Husain. The entire place had a unique smell, not off putting, just different, a mixture of sweet potato, smoke, pollution, and even garbage, thankfully there was no tear gas!

Then, I stumbled into Sayyed, a middle-aged man with modest clothing, sitting on his bike carrying a sign with three words; Samak (fish), Laban (milk), Tamerind (Egyptian local drink).
“I was here from day one of the revolution, I helped this American journalist who was assaulted (I think he meant Lara Logan), and I carried many injured on my bike during Mohamed Mahmoud’s events. Now I’ve had enough and I don’t like what I see, they are abusing Tahrir, this is not the way it should be.”  He said.
My conversation with Sayyed turned into a lively and passionate discussion when a group of men joined in. They all acknowledged how the situation is confusing, and messy. They expressed anger at everyone; the army, the Islamists, the non-Islamists parties and the activists. “Every one has his own agenda, they do not care about this country any more, they only care about their own glory,” one young guy said.

However, when I asked what is the right way forward? the agreement quickly evaporated and was replaced with heated argument. Some including Sayyed want no more sit-in Tahrir, whilst others insist that demonstrations are the only way forward until the revolution achieves all the demands. Some expressed mistrust towards the Islamists, others expressed confidence in them. The heated argument become louder and louder. An old guy whispered in my ear, “no one wants to listen, instead, each one wants to impose his views. It is a dirty battle of ideas, a form of mental thuggery.”

The debate in Tahrir was indicative of the wider poisonous political environment in Egypt. Sayyed’s sign -Fish, Milk and Tamarind- (a statement commonly used in Egypt to describe a cocktail of unrelated and totally mismatching stuff) reflect the sour and even pathological relationship between the military council, the revolutionary activists and the new Islamic parliamentary majority.  

Tahrir has become the Avatar of the New Egypt that is constantly changing its colours, and style in order to reflect the post-uprising dynamics in a complex fragile political order. Currently, not just politicians are divided about the future of Egypt; ordinary Egyptians seem also divided about the best way forward.

Egyptians are torn between their long-term addiction to stability, and their newly acquired fascination with demonstrations. Both the Islamists and the Military Council are happy to exploit their dilemma for political gains.

Therefore, it is crucial for Egyptians to understand that fake stability is not sustainable, and it is about time to wean  ”our daddy” out of politics simply because it is not a healthy relationship any more. On the other hand, activists need to understand that angry demonstrations without a clear roadmap is simply pointless. Slogans like “down with military rule,” and  ”bread, freedom and social justice” are great but need to be coupled with a clear process of how, when and why.
If the 25th of January 2011 was about throwing Mubarak out of  power, 25th of January 2012 should be about the new constitution.

This constitution is the key for throwing the military out of power, and the safety valve that can protect the new democracy from any tyrannic tendency by the new Islamic parliamentary majority.  It should help Egypt to develop a strong civil society with reforms in education, minority rights, freedom of worship and independence of religious authority. These are the kind of demands, which I hope to see on Wednesday.

Both the Military and the Islamists need to understand that the days of  propaganda, rhetorics and playing with emotions are long gone, and the society is the new big brother that is continuously watching them.

As Sayyed in Tahrir aptly explained, the current political cocktail is not harmonious with smelly fish, curdled milk, and vinegary tamarind. Now it is the time for fresh ingredients  and political maturity in order to demystify the foggy political sphere. Purging of the old  toxic system needs more than anger. It needs time, shrewdness and political resilience. The damage limitation of the dodgy transitional period should start right now.
Egypt's Twitter graph

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Palestinian "Cyber attack"...

You can find this (Busy) "Jew" on - 
Twitter search - #Israel
Jew4palestine: I think we should ban Hebrew , just because its an ugly language !
Oh come on you know its true!!
  Alexander Münch
Jew4palestine: So, U want to ban Hebrew coz its an ugly language !..
I LOVE #Israel
Jew4palestineMOST MORMONS I KNOW are warm, and kind what planet did Mit come from?
  Alexander Münch
Jew4palestine: MOST MORONS I KNOW are warm, and kind what planet did YOU come from?
End of Palestinian - Israeli DIALOGUE!...
Jew4palestine Look what Israel did to this 5 year old body.


From the:-
"The Land of Israel, was the birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their spiritual, religious and political identity was shaped. Here they first attained to statehood, created cultural values of national and universal significance and gave to the world the eternal Book of Books."

Deuteronomy 22:13-21

King James Version (KJV)
 13  If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her,
 14  And give occasions of speech against her, and bring up an evil name upon her, and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid:
 15  Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel's virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate:
 16  And the damsel's father shall say unto the elders, I gave my daughter unto this man to wife, and he hateth her;
 17  And, lo, he hath given occasions of speech against her, saying, I found not thy daughter a maid; and yet these are the tokens of my daughter's virginity. And they shall spread the cloth before the elders of the city.
 18  And the elders of that city shall take that man and chastise him;
 19  And they shall amerce him in an hundred shekels of silver, and give them unto the father of the damsel, because he hath brought up an evil name upon a virgin of Israel: and she shall be his wife; he may not put her away all his days.
 20  But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel:
 21  Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.

"Forty years before the destruction" of the Temple in Jerusalem in 70 CE, i.e. in 30 CE, the Sanhedrin effectively abolished capital punishment, making it a hypothetical upper limit on the severity of punishment, fitting in finality for God alone to use, not fallible humans.
See also:- John 18:31
Pilate said, "Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law."
"But we have no right to execute anyone," the Jews objected.


Albert Einstein

Walid Shoebat


Allah's Representatives!

DEMOCRAPOLA in action!

Sunday, January 22, 2012


Christians and moderate Muslims are trying to stem the tide of Islamo-fascism in the heart of the former Yugoslavia.

by John Newton and Eva-Marie Kolman
January 20, 2012

The rise of radical Islam in Bosnia-Herzegovina is going unchallenged by the authorities, the country’s leading bishop has warned. Cardinal Vinko Puljic, the Archbishop of Sarajevo, highlighted the growth of extremism in the country during a visit to the international headquarters of Aid to the Church in Need.
The 66-year-old cardinal said that the growing process of Islamisation in Bosnia-Herzegovina is being funded by radicals in the Middle East. He said: “Muslim centres and mosques have been built in many places with petrodollars from Saudi Arabia.”
During the interview with ACN in Königstein, Germany, the cardinal stressed the spread of Wahhabism, an Islamic reform movement, which is the official religion of Saudi Arabia. Many commentators have linked Wahhabism to terrorist movements such as al-Qaeda.
The Archbishop of Sarajevo said that there are already 3-5,000 Wahhabis in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the group is seeking to gain influence in society. Cardinal Puljic said: “Nobody in the government has the courage to do anything to prevent this development.” According to Aid to the Church in Need’s report on the oppression of Christians, Persecuted and Forgotten?, more than 100,000 young Bosnian Muslims have encountered Wahhabi Islam through organisations such as Active Islamic Youth, Furqan, and the Muslim Youth Council. Cardinal Puljic added: “In recent years, at least 70 new mosques have been built in Sarajevo alone.”
Reports state that Saudi Arabian money funded the reconstruction of Sarajevo’s Husrev Begova Mosque which included the removal of internal mosaics in accordance with Wahhabi aesthetics.  Another new mosque, the King Fahd Mosque, which is the country’s largest Islamic place of worship, was described by one report as a magnet for Muslim fundamentalists.
While mosques are being built or repaired, Cardinal Puljic pointed out that building approval for churches can be delayed for years – adding that Church property confiscated under communism has still not been returned.
He said that the government “has no interest in giving the Catholic Church back its property” while in most cases Muslim property has been returned.
The Archbishop of Sarajevo went on to say that “Catholics are systematically disadvantaged” and demanded equal treatment for Catholics in employment, education and other spheres of life.
Despite these problems, the cardinal said the Catholic Church is seeking greater cooperation between different ethnic and religious groups. He said: “We are a minority but we are a constructive force that wishes to make a contribution to the success of society.”
Sister Ivanka Mihaljevic, Provincial Superior of the Franciscan Sisters of Christ the King in Bosnia, described how the community had launched a three-year programme called ‘I extend to you my hand for peaceful coexistence’.
Under the programme, Roman Catholics, Muslims and Serbian Orthodox Christians work together to promote tolerance, non-violence and mutual respect.
She told Aid to the Church in Need: “These are small steps of peace and goodwill but we want to imbue the people with courage.”
The country is about 40 percent Muslim and 31 percent are Serbian Orthodox.  Catholics account for 10 percent.  Of the 820,000 Catholics who lived in Bosnia-Herzegovina before the 1992-5 war, only 460,000 remain and emigration is ongoing.

Saturday, January 21, 2012


Final results in Egypt: 70% to Islamic parties! 

Myth: Democracy elected Hitler to power.
Fact: Hitler used backroom deals, not votes, to come to power.

Hitler never had more than 37% of the popular vote in the honest elections that occurred before he became Chancellor. And the opposition among the 63 percent against him was generally quite strong. Hitler therefore would have never seen the light of day had the German Republic been truly democratic. Unfortunately, its otherwise sound constitution contained a few fatal flaws. The German leaders also had a weak devotion to democracy, and some were actively plotting to overthrow it. Hitler furthermore enjoyed an almost unbroken string of luck in coming to power. He benefited greatly from the Great Depression, the half-senility of the president, the incompetence of his opposition, and the appearance of an unnecessary backroom deal just as the Nazis were starting to lose popular appeal and votes. 


Critics of democracy often claim that Hitler was democratically elected to power. This is untrue. Hitler never had the popular votes to become Chancellor of Germany, and the only reason he got the job was because the German leaders entered into a series of back-room deals. Some claim that Hitler's rise was nonetheless legal under the German system. The problem is that what was "legal" under the German system would not be considered legal under a truer and better-working democracy. In a democracy along the lines of the United States or Great Britain, Hitler could have never risen to power.
Is it true Adolf Hitler was elected democratically?
And if so what were the Germans thinking of?
How could this happen?
Could another nutter get in?
If so surely democracy is'nt that perfect after all.

He used Democracy to get himself into power so he could change Germany into the Nazi regime. He was a powerful speaker so he was able to persuade the Germans to vote for him. He promised to make their economy better and to become more powerful than ever. Well he was true to his word. Germany's economic and military power increased tremendously. The Nazi Army was almost unstoppable and the economy was booming. I mean it took many countries including the U.S. to stop Hitler. Russia , Great Britain, France and several other countries could not take down Germany. It took the U.S. to enter the war to finally end the Axis powers from conquering the world. Maybe if the U.S. had never entered the war, maybe we would all be speaking German right now.

You may think Hitler was a nut but to the German people he was like a hero. Its all in a matter of opinion and not about facts when it comes to world leaders.

Democracy is not perfect what so ever. I t has so many flaws and yet there are many positives to it. Adolf Hitler knew of its flaws and used it to get himself into power. Nobody expected him to do what he did. 


Bashar al-Assad has been elected president of Syria with
of the votes in a nationwide referendum.